Eldridge outside the presence of the jury. Eldridge on the Times article paragraph by paragraph, just as was done when he examined Mr. Counsel for New England apparently intended to question Mr.
Unsuccessful in its attempt to introduce the Times article head-on, New England sought to introduce it through an examination of Lorna Anderson's current husband, Charles Randall Eldridge, who was present at the reporter's interview of his wife. 89-3080) in denying New England's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. In these two consolidated appeals, New England argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the issue of procurement in excluding certain evidence and testimony at trial and (No. New England was held liable for the full amount of the policy. At the conclusion of trial on August 28, 1987, the jury found that the policy had not been fraudulently procured. She later disclaimed any interest in the proceeds, and prosecuted the counterclaim on behalf of the four minor children of the marriage.
Lorna Anderson Eldridge, Martin Anderson's widow (since remarried) who was a defendant below, filed a counterclaim seeking the policy proceeds.
New England Mutual Life Insurance Company brought this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not obligated to pay $270,000 under an insurance policy issued on the life of Martin Anderson because the policy had been fraudulently procured.
0 kommentar(er)
